COPYRIGHT : Jurisdiction Of Law : Varies From Country To Country : Statute Law Prevails In Canada : United Kingdom : United States : LAW

OUR HOME : CAVEAT - IDLE NO MORE ULALI - CAVEAT : OUR NATION

2022 A.D.E.     SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST     2022 A.D.E.
ETC 2 3 4 5 as related to the void Hudson's Bay Company Charter Fitzgerald Examinations / Examine : 1613 : Yuquot : BC : Utrecht
The Image Below Is The Link To Kwa'mutsun Nation State
(see at end of this publication for law of the internet in Canada)
COPYRIGHT
Kwa'mutsun Nation State Is A Sovereign Territory; Head Of State Is An Absolute Monarch
Notation : Creative Commons : Notation
For The Purposes Of This Publication, The Following Will Consider Canadian Law And International Law Parameters
Example - ONTARIO - Business
CANADA GOVERNMENT - COPYRIGHT - AS AMENDED 2022 JUNE
DEFINITION : "In the simplest terms, "copyright" means "the right to copy." In general, copyright means the sole right to produce or reproduce a work or a substantial part of it in any form. It includes the right to perform the work or any substantial part of it or, in the case of a lecture, to deliver it. If the work is unpublished, copyright includes the right to publish the work or any substantial part of it." : DEFINITION

"The general term* of copyright protection in Canada is changing from the life of the creator plus 50 years to the life of the creator plus 70 years, effective December 30, 2022. This term extension was agreed to in the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement trade treaty. The new term matches the general copyright term in the United States and a number of other countries around the world. When copyright in a work expires, that work enters the public domain, meaning it is no longer protected and there are no longer any restrictions on its use. (For more information about the types of works that are protected by copyright, see this FAQ.)"
"This work, the Simon Fraser University Copyright website, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License unless otherwise noted."
"

SFU has a Fair Dealing Policy which lays out how much you can copy for purposes of education, research and private study.

Whether something is ‘fair’ will depend on the circumstances. Courts will normally consider factors such as:

  • The purpose of the dealing (Is it commercial or research / educational?)
  • The character of the dealing (What was done with the work? Was it an isolated use or an ongoing, repetitive use? How widely was it distributed?)
  • The amount of the dealing (How much was copied?)
  • Alternatives to the dealing (Was the work necessary for the end result? Could a different work have been used instead?)
  • The nature of the work (Is there a public interest in its dissemination? Was it previously unpublished?)
  • The effect of the dealing on the original work (Does the use compete with the market of the original work?)

It is not necessary that your use satisfy every one of these factors in order to be fair, and no one factor is determinative by itself. In assessing whether your use is fair, a court would look at the factors as a whole to determine if, on balance, your use is fair.  

If, having taken into account these considerations, the use can be characterized as ‘fair’ and it was for the purpose of research, private study, education, satire, parody, criticism, review or news reporting, then it will fall within the fair dealing exception and will not require permission from the copyright owner. In addition, if your purpose is criticism, review or news reporting you must also mention the source and author of the work. For further clarity and additional information about limits on the amount and nature of copying permitted under fair dealing in certain contexts, please see the Application of Fair Dealing under Policy R30.04. The application of these limits to teaching at SFU is outlined in the top section of the Copyright Infographic.

Please note as well; it is important to distinguish "fair dealing" from "fair use." The fair use exception in U.S. copyright law is NOT the equivalent of fair dealing in Canadian law. The wording of the two exceptions is different. It is important to make sure that you consider the Canadian law and are not relying on U.S. information, which has no jurisdiction in Canada."

"If you are copying material for use on a website, in publicity materials, for publication or any other use outside a course, you may need the permission of the copyright holder."
INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT LAW

"While no creative work is automatically protected worldwide, there are international treaties which provide protection automatically for all creative works as soon as they are fixed in a medium. There…

International copyright is the act of keeping the original title in the name of the original creator throughout the world.

International copyright infringement law is there in order to give the justice to the real owner or creator of the creative works.

Someone who works in international copyright law will tell you that it is different than most other sectors of law. It involves knowing the copyright law of two or more countries."

World Intellectual Property Organization - WIPO : United Nations : WIPO Website

"The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) joined the United Nations Sustainable Development Group (UNSDG) on January 1, 2022. WIPO’s Secretariat submits this report to the 2022 High-Level Political Forum (HLPF), in response to the invitation by Mr. Collen Vixen Kelapile, President, UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)."

LAW OF THE INTERNET IN CANADA

Legal Opinion (1)

"When material is placed on the Internet, it can generally be accessed from anywhere in the world. Such material must obviously comply with the laws of the country where the server is located. However, depending on the nature of the material, it may also need to comply with the laws of the other countries where the material may be accessed. This can include intellectual property laws, unfair business practices legislation, consumer protection laws, criminal laws, securities legislation and many others. Of course, there are always grey zones, and individual legal jurisdictions may take different approaches."

OUR HOME : CAVEAT - IDLE NO MORE ULALI - CAVEAT : OUR NATION

ADDENDUM

"Ok  ..... so if the photograph in in the public domain, you don't need to ask permission or pay fees (except maybe a one-time fee for an actual physical or digital copy). You’re free to do whatever you want with the copy, generally. Why generally? Because there are some exceptions to what you can do, even then.

If the photograph you want to use includes an identifiable person and you want to use the photo commercially (in an advertisement, say), you’ll need to get permission. If you don’t, you could violate his or her publicity or privacy rights. And no, it doesn’t matter if the person is dead (well, maybe Elvis isn’t ... ;-)." Copyright Public Domain Sherpa

"Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), was a landmark case of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court upheld the right to have an abortion as established by the "essential holding" of Roe v. Wade (1973) and issued as its "key judgment" the imposition of the undue burden standard when evaluating state-imposed restrictions on that right.[1] Both the essential holding of Roe and the key judgment of Casey were overturned by the Supreme Court in 2022, with its landmark decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization." WKI

2022 A.D.E.     SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST     2022 A.D.E.



Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)